Cyber/ravenscott-blog
1
0
Fork 0
forked from snxraven/ravenscott-blog
Code Pull Requests Activity

update

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Raven Scott 2024-10-28 17:11:10 -04:00
parent 9ee315d8b0
commit a9615274f1
1 changed files with 54 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

54
markdown/Decentralized, Firewall-Resistant Peer-to-Peer DNS System.md
View File

@ -90,6 +90,60 @@ With this P2P DNS system, the ability to create and maintain digital identities
To create a comprehensive code walkthrough for the above setup, here’s an expanded breakdown:
### The Evolution of DNS Records in a Decentralized P2P Network
Traditional DNS systems operate within a rigid framework of standardized record types, such as **A (IPv4 address)**, **AAAA (IPv6 address)**, **CNAME (canonical name)**, **MX (mail exchange)**, and others. These records are designed for hierarchical, centralized DNS structures and have served internet infrastructure well. However, as networks evolve towards peer-to-peer (P2P) configurations, new possibilities for DNS records emerge, enabling more flexible, versatile ways to store and retrieve data. This P2P DNS implementation introduces the potential for custom records, such as a **HASH** record type, while the `dnsCore` store provides an extensible foundation for expanding DNS record types beyond traditional norms.
#### Introducing New Record Types: The HASH Record
In a P2P DNS system, where each domain’s presence is based on decentralized data syncing across peers, a **HASH** record can serve a unique purpose. This record type would store a cryptographic hash of the domain’s content or identity, acting as a unique identifier for that domain in the P2P network.
The HASH record could represent:
- **Domain identity**: By generating a unique hash for each domain, peers can identify and verify the domain’s presence in the network.
- **Data integrity**: Hashes ensure that the data associated with each domain hasn’t been altered during transmission across peers, adding an extra layer of authenticity.
- **Versioning**: Hashes can also represent versions, allowing for controlled, trackable updates to domains, where each version generates a new hash.
For instance, a `HASH` record for a domain `mydomain.p2p` might return a unique hash such as `07b8b52fbbad7a89ce26ad2d8375e6a82b2e3c02f18596bddff18e9c31164b04`, which P2P clients could use to confirm authenticity or trigger specific behaviors in the network.
#### Expanding DNS Record Types for P2P Networks
With the `dnsCore` storage, this system can flexibly store a range of other record types, beyond the scope of traditional DNS records. By configuring `dnsCore` to handle different data structures, we can imagine new P2P-specific record types that support the unique needs of decentralized networks:
1. **TX (Transaction)**:
- In a network with distributed ledger features, a `TX` record could store transaction data. This could be useful in decentralized finance or smart contract systems, where each domain represents a contract or account, and the DNS record maintains transaction history or balances.
2. **PEER**:
- This record would store peer information, such as public keys, IP addresses, or even capabilities (e.g., storage or computational power). A `PEER` record could allow a domain to advertise peer services within the P2P network, enabling resource sharing or specialized services between nodes.
3. **FINGERPRINT**:
- Similar to the HASH record but focused on device or software fingerprints, the `FINGERPRINT` record could store cryptographic identifiers representing specific configurations or setups, helping peers verify that they’re connecting to trusted nodes running verified software or hardware configurations.
4. **CONTENT**:
- A `CONTENT` record could act like a mini-file system, storing content hashes and metadata for files or media associated with the domain. This approach could support decentralized websites or applications hosted across peers, where each node can retrieve the content directly based on its hash.
5. **AUTH**:
- Authentication data for connecting peers could be stored in `AUTH` records, containing information about authentication keys or tokens, establishing a decentralized way to manage access control within a P2P network.
6. **LOCATION**:
- Useful in IoT and decentralized location-based services, a `LOCATION` record could store coordinates, proximity data, or network topology information for each peer, enabling features like geographic routing or localized services.
7. **PUBKEY (Public Key)**:
- For secure communications, a `PUBKEY` record could hold the public key associated with a domain, enabling encrypted data exchange. This record type would be integral to applications where data confidentiality is critical and could replace traditional SSL certificates in a decentralized way.
#### Customizing DNS Records for P2P Flexibility
In this P2P DNS setup, `dnsCore` enables flexible record storage, meaning developers can add new record types or redefine traditional ones to suit their use cases. For example, an **A** record doesn’t have to map to an IPv4 address but could instead point to a local alias or a service port within the network. This flexibility allows for custom configurations like:
- **Dynamic record types based on peer capabilities**: Records could adjust based on the node's available resources, such as bandwidth or storage.
- **Service-specific records**: Domains could advertise services they offer via custom records that communicate details about those services, like required protocols or resource access points.
- **Environment-specific records**: Records could vary based on the environment, allowing P2P DNS to serve configurations suited to different operating systems or network conditions.
#### Redefining Traditional DNS Concepts in P2P
Moving away from static IP-based addressing towards content-based, service-oriented DNS models opens possibilities like:
- **Service Discovery**: Instead of IP addresses, records could map to specific services, enabling a more modular and discoverable network.
- **Data Storage**: DNS entries could store large datasets by breaking down data into retrievable chunks, enabling distributed data access across peers.
- **Autonomous Networking**: Peers could operate independently with records that manage their own syncing schedules or connection preferences, making the network adaptable.
## Code Walkthrough: Peer Discovery, DNS, and HTTP Proxying in a P2P Network
This implementation involves components for peer discovery, DNS resolution, virtual networking, and HTTP proxying, integrating `Hyperswarm` and `Corestore` to achieve a decentralized DNS system. Here's an in-depth analysis: